Constrained customization of non-coplanar beam orientations in radiotherapy of brain tumours
- 1 January 1999
- journal article
- Published by IOP Publishing in Physics in Medicine & Biology
- Vol. 44 (2) , 383-399
- https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/44/2/007
Abstract
A methodology for the constrained customization of non-coplanar beam orientations in radiotherapy treatment planning has been developed and tested on a cohort of five patients with tumours of the brain. The methodology employed a combination of single and multibeam cost functions to produce customized beam orientations. The single-beam cost function was used to reduce the search space for the multibeam cost function, which was minimized using a fast simulated annealing algorithm. The scheme aims to produce well-spaced, customized beam orientations for each patient that produce low dose to organs at risk (OARs). The customized plans were compared with standard plans containing the number and orientation of beams chosen by a human planner. The beam orientation constraint-customized plans employed the same number of treatment beams as the standard plan but with beam orientations chosen by the constrained-customization scheme. Improvements from beam orientation constraint-customization were studied in isolation by customizing the beam weights of both plans using a dose-based downhill simplex algorithm. The results show that beam orientation constraint-customization reduced the maximum dose to the orbits by an average of 18.8 (, 1SD)% and to the optic nerves by 11.4 (, 1SD)% with no degradation of the planning target volume (PTV) dose distribution. The mean doses, averaged over the patient cohort, were reduced by 4.2 (, 1SD)% and 12.4 ( 1SD)% for the orbits and optic nerves respectively. In conclusion, the beam orientation constraint-customization can reduce the dose to OARs, for few-beam treatment plans, when compared with standard treatment plans developed by a human planner.Keywords
This publication has 38 references indexed in Scilit:
- Methods for transferring patient and plan data between radiotherapy treatment planning systems.The British Journal of Radiology, 1997
- Selection of coplanar or noncoplanar beams using three-dimensional optimization based on maximum beam separation and minimized nontarget irradiationInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, 1997
- Genetic and geometric optimization of three‐dimensional radiation therapy treatment planningMedical Physics, 1996
- Patterns of care survey results: Treatment planning for carcinoma of the prostateInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, 1995
- Determination of beam orientation in radiotherapy planningMedical Physics, 1994
- Random restarting versus simulated annealingComputers & Mathematics with Applications, 1994
- The use of beam's eye view volumetrics in the selection of non-coplanar radiation portalsInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, 1992
- Fitting of normal tissue tolerance data to an analytic functionInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, 1991
- Methods of image reconstruction from projections applied to conformation radiotherapyPhysics in Medicine & Biology, 1990
- Optimization of stationary and moving beam radiation therapy techniquesRadiotherapy and Oncology, 1988