Local government discretion and accountability in Burkina Faso
- 13 December 2010
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Public Administration and Development
- Vol. 30 (5) , 329-344
- https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.579
Abstract
Burkina Faso opted for a progressive approach to decentralization reforms, aiming at building local government capacity first before transferring responsibilities. We employ a diagnostic framework to analyze local government discretion and accountability in Burkina Faso. We find that local governments have a very low degree of discretionary power accompanied with weak accountability towards citizens at all levels. In the political and administrative spheres, the center plays a dominant role in local government affairs leaving little space for discretion. In the fiscal sphere, taxing powers are restricted, while transfers are insufficient and unpredictable, making local financial management extremely difficult. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Linking Local Government Discretion and Accountability in DecentralisationDevelopment Policy Review, 2010
- Patronage, District Creation, and Reform in UgandaStudies in Comparative International Development, 2010
- Urban Protest in Burkina FasoAfrican Affairs, 2009
- Traditional Chieftaincy, Party Politics, and Political Violence in Burkina FasoPublished by Springer Nature ,2007
- L'élection présidentielle du 13 novembre 2005 : un plébiscite par défautPolitique africaine, 2006
- Décentralisation et pouvoirs traditionnels : le paradoxe des légitimités localesMondes en développement, 2006
- Decentralisation and local governance: experiences from Francophone West africaPublic Administration and Development, 2003
- Decentralization and Reform in AfricaPublished by Springer Nature ,2002
- Capitalism and Autochthony: The Seesaw of Mobility and BelongingPublic Culture, 2000
- The New Relevance of Traditional Authorities in AfricaThe Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law, 1996