A Practical Method for Identifying Significant Change Scores
- 1 December 1977
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Educational and Psychological Measurement
- Vol. 37 (4) , 889-895
- https://doi.org/10.1177/001316447703700411
Abstract
The current literature on measuring "change" contains several methods for estimating difference scores for pretest-posttest designs. While the significance of group difference scores obtained with these techniques can be evaluated using standard statistical tests, the researcher in applied settings is frequently more concerned with identifying individuals who are most (or least) influenced by a particular treatment. This paper presents a simple, easy-to-apply test of significance for identifying such individuals. The technique requires as input 3 pieces of information: true difference scores, the reliability of the obtained differences, and their standard error of measurement. Selection can then be done on the basis of visual inspection of the distribution of difference scores.Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- PROSPER--Training and Research for Increasing Management Awareness of Affirmative Action in Race Relations.The Academy of Management Journal, 1976
- How we should measure "change": Or should we?Psychological Bulletin, 1970
- A Note on the Analysis of Gains and Posttest ScoresEducational and Psychological Measurement, 1967
- A Base-Free Measure of ChangePsychometrika, 1966
- On Growth MeasurementEducational and Psychological Measurement, 1958