Effects of alcohols on responses evoked by inositol trisphosphate in Xenopus oocytes.

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
1. The effects of ethanol and other alcohols on inositol 1,4,5‐trisphosphate (InsP3) signalling were studied in Xenopus oocytes by the use of flash photolysis of caged InsP3. Calcium liberation induced by InsP3 was monitored by voltage‐clamp recording of Ca(2+)‐activated membrane currents, and by fluorescence of the Ca2+ indicator Fluo‐3. 2. Membrane current and fluorescence Ca2+ signals evoked by light flashes giving small responses were initially potentiated by bath application of ethanol (80‐400 mM). However, the responses subsequently declined while ethanol was present and were strongly reduced or suppressed when it was removed. 3. These effects did not arise artifactually from changes in photolysis of caged InsP3, as similar results were seen with responses evoked by intracellular injections of InsP3. Also, the effects on the membrane current did not arise primarily through actions on the Ca(2+)‐dependent Cl‐ channels, since currents evoked by intracellular injections of Ca2+ were little changed by ethanol. 4. Ethanol reduced the threshold level of InsP3 required to cause Ca2+ liberation. Thus, potentiation was most prominent with small responses evoked by brief light flashes, whereas the predominant effect on larger responses was inhibitory. 5. The facilitatory and inhibitory actions of ethanol persisted after removing extracellular Ca2+. 6. Intracellular injections of ethanol produced an initial inhibition of InsP3 responses, followed, in some oocytes, by a potentiation. 7. Methanol had little effect on InsP3 responses, whereas butanol and other long‐chain alcohols produced strong inhibition, but little or no potentiation. 8. We conclude that extracellular application of ethanol produces a rapid potentiation of InsP3‐mediated Ca2+ liberation, and a more slowly developing inhibition. The potentiation may arise through stimulation of InsP3 formation at the plasma membrane, whereas the inhibition occurs more deeply in the cell. Both actions were evident at relatively low concentrations (a few tens of millimoles per litre), and might thus be important in the behavioural effects of ethanol intoxication.