Young Children's Responses to Direct and Indirect Directives
- 1 December 1983
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in The Journal of Genetic Psychology
- Vol. 143 (2) , 217-227
- https://doi.org/10.1080/00221325.1983.10533555
Abstract
Theories in the philosophy of language suggest that the comprehension of indirect requests is a more difficult process than understanding direct requests and involves inferring the intention of the speaker. The results of the present research challenge this accepted theoretical view. Twenty-five girls and 23 boys, 3.2–6.3 years of age, were tested on their comprehension of two types of directives: (a) Nonconventional indirect directives (NID), those not of the imperative form which omit the desired action and agent of action, and (b) Conventional directives (CD), those of the imperative form. An ANOVA demonstrated that the children responded as appropriately to NID as they did to CD. A correlational analysis yielded neither convergent nor discriminant validity for two separate constructs, understanding NID and understanding CD.This publication has 4 references indexed in Scilit:
- How to Do Things by Asking: Form-Function Pairings in Mothers' Questions and Their Relation to Children's ResponsesChild Development, 1979
- Children's Understanding of Speech Acts in Unconventional Directive FramesChild Development, 1978
- Children's comprehension of their mothers' question-directivesJournal of Child Language, 1978
- Understanding what is meant from what is said: A study in conversationally conveyed requestsJournal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1975