Effects of Gender Inclusive/Exclusive Language in Religious Discourse
- 1 June 1991
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Journal of Language and Social Psychology
- Vol. 10 (2) , 81-98
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927x91102001
Abstract
Religious speech (i.e. preaching) is a prominent language event, yet it has received scant attention in research on language and attitudes. In recent years, many religious institutions have adopted reforms mandating gender-inclusive (non-sexist) language. Only a few studies have examined the effects of gender-inclusive or gender-exclusive language use on listeners' judgments of speakers, and none of these examine religious discourse in particular. In addition, few studies have examined how variables like gender-role typing or attitude toward equal rights for women and men might mediate between gender-linked language and judgments of speakers. In the present study, a male and a female audiotaped each of two sermon texts in both gender-inclusive and gender-exclusive language guises. Findings indicate that ministers who adopt gender-inclusive language suffer no negative evaluations. Three mediating variables proved to be especially potent in predicting listeners' responses to the stimulus sermons: attitude toward sexist language, expressive gender-role typing, and perceptions of women's rights. Implications for language reform policies and for further research on gender-inclusive language are discussed.Keywords
This publication has 36 references indexed in Scilit:
- The design and analysis of language experiments in communicationCommunication Monographs, 1989
- Attitudes about gender bias in language: A reevaluationSex Roles, 1988
- Use of nonsexist pronouns as a function of one's feminist orientationSex Roles, 1985
- GENERALIZING ABOUT MESSAGES: SUGGESTIONS FOR DESIGN AND ANALYSIS OF EXPERIMENTSHuman Communication Research, 1983
- Changes in Pronominal Usage in a Classroom SituationPsychology of Women Quarterly, 1981
- The Word of God and the Words of the PreacherReview of Religious Research, 1980
- Conservatism, sex‐typing, and the use of titles: Miss, Mrs, or Ms?European Journal of Social Psychology, 1979
- Speech style and impression formation in a court setting: The effects of “powerful” and “powerless” speechJournal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1978
- Nonsexist Language Use in TransitionJournal of Communication, 1978
- Does Sex‐biased Job Advertising “Aid and Abet” Sex Discrimination?1Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 1973