Water-Soluble Phosphazene Polymers for Parenteral and Mucosal Vaccine Delivery
- 1 January 1995
- book chapter
- Published by Springer Nature
- Vol. 6, 473-493
- https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1823-5_20
Abstract
The advent of modern molecular biology has provided us with a means of producing antigens with unprecedented ease and precision. It is ironic that these new methodologies generate purified antigens that do not generally induce a strong immune response in the absence of an effective adjuvant. The development of improved vaccine adjuvants for use in humans has therefore become a priority area of research. Nevertheless, research on adjuvants has lagged seriously behind the work done on antigens. For decades the only adjuvant widely used in humans has been alum. Saponin and its purified component Quil A, complete Freund’s adjuvant (CFA) and other adjuvants used in research and veterinary applications have toxicities that limit their potential use in human vaccines. New chemically defined preparations such as QS-21, muramyl dipeptide, and monophosphoryl lipid A are being studied.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Hydrolytic degradation of ionically cross‐linked polyphosphazene microspheresJournal of Applied Polymer Science, 1994
- Controlled release using ionotropic polyphosphazene hydrogelsJournal of Controlled Release, 1993
- Immunological MemoryAnnual Review of Immunology, 1993
- Immunological Adjuvants and Their Mode of ActionBiotechnology (reading, Mass.), 1992
- A Novel Synthetic Method for Hybridoma Cell EncapsulationNature Biotechnology, 1991
- Ionically crosslinkable polyphosphazene: a novel polymer for microencapsulationJournal of the American Chemical Society, 1990
- Biodegradable Microspheres: Vaccine Delivery System for Oral ImmunizationPublished by Springer Nature ,1989
- An ionically crosslinkable polyphosphazene: poly[bis(carboxylatophenoxy)phosphazene] and its hydrogels and membranesMacromolecules, 1989
- THE ADJUVANT EFFECT OF MICROBIAL PRODUCTS ON THE IMMUNE RESPONSEAnnual Review of Microbiology, 1976