Alienation and its Psychological Correlates
- 1 October 1986
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in The Journal of Social Psychology
- Vol. 126 (5) , 593-597
- https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.1986.9713631
Abstract
As previous studies of alienation can be criticized on the grounds that most measures do not control for acquiescence, the present study sought to reexamine the relationship between alienation and certain psychological variables in an Australian and in a white South African sample. This study used the new balanced General Alienation Scale (Ray, 1982). Results showed the alienated to be anxious (both samples), to have low self-esteem (South Africa), not to be respectful of those in authority, and to be of any age (both samples). The alienated in both samples were also found not to be political radicals. This latter finding is in contrast to earlier research (Ray, 1974).This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Global Self-Esteem Scales: Unidimensional or Multidimensional?Psychological Reports, 1985
- Alienation, dogmatism and acquiescenceJournal of Clinical Psychology, 1984
- Authoritarianism or Acquiescence? South African FindingsThe Journal of Social Psychology, 1983
- A concise scale for the assessment of attitudes towards institutional authorityAustralian Journal of Psychology, 1982
- Acquaintance ratings as criteria of adjustmentAustralian Psychologist, 1979
- Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement.Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 1966
- Continuities in Measurement, 1959-1963Social Forces, 1965
- Alienation: Its Meaning and MeasurementAmerican Sociological Review, 1961
- On The Meaning of AlienationAmerican Sociological Review, 1959
- A personality scale of manifest anxiety.The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1953