Consideration of the Challenges, Complications, and Pitfalls of Taxometric Analysis.
- 1 February 2004
- journal article
- Published by American Psychological Association (APA) in Journal of Abnormal Psychology
- Vol. 113 (1) , 10-23
- https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-843x.113.1.10
Abstract
The taxometric analytic procedures developed by P. E. Meehl and colleagues represent powerful statistical tools for use in the evaluation of observed quantitative data for the possible existence of a qualitative latent class, natural subgroup, or, more commonly, a taxon. Taxometric methods, like any other statistical procedures, require thoughtful application, and the responsibility for proper interpretation of the results from a taxometric study lies with the investigator. Any investigator using taxometric methods must be mindful of those substantive and methodological issues that will facilitate the most fruitful utilization of the general taxometric approach, as well as those issues that will handicap or, perhaps, fatally flaw a taxometric investigation. A number of these issues are highlighted and discussed in this article, and a reader's, writer's, and reviewer's guide for the evaluation of taxometric research reports is provided.Keywords
This publication has 40 references indexed in Scilit:
- What's in a Taxon?Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 2004
- Trajectory of cognitive science and psychological assessment: Current status and expectations.Psychological Assessment, 2002
- Deeper into the schizotypy taxon: On the robust nature of maximum covariance analysis.Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 1999
- Tracking the taxon: on the latent structure and base rate of schizotypyPublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,1995
- Bootstraps taxometrics: Solving the classification problem in psychopathology.American Psychologist, 1995
- Factors and Taxa, Traits and Types, Differences of Degree and Differences in KindJournal of Personality, 1992
- Toward an Integrated Theory of Schizotaxia, Schizotypy, and SchizophreniaJournal of Personality Disorders, 1990
- The Analysis of Consistency in Personality AssessmentJournal of Personality, 1988
- Exploratory Latent Structure Analysis Using Both Identifiable and Unidentifiable ModelsBiometrika, 1974
- Construct validity in psychological tests.Psychological Bulletin, 1955