What's in a Taxon?
Top Cited Papers
- 1 February 2004
- journal article
- Published by American Psychological Association (APA) in Journal of Abnormal Psychology
- Vol. 113 (1) , 39-43
- https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-843x.113.1.39
Abstract
Whether taxometrics yields inferential knowledge to something latent is partly but not wholly a semantic question. Although the single variables are manifest indicator scores of individuals, the statistics computed from them via postulates of the formalism are not mere data summaries and will be incorrect or meaningless if the structural conjectures are false. The unidirectional derivability from postulates to data relations supplies the taxonic inferences' surplus meaning that constitutes conventional psychometric meaning of latency (e.g., latent class analysis). Surplus meaning beyond the purely mathematical may be provided by interpretive text attributing unobserved attributes or causal origin to taxon members.Keywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- CLIOMETRIC METATHEORY: II. CRITERIA SCIENTISTS USE IN THEORY APPRAISAL AND WHY IT IS RATIONAL TO DO SO (Monograph Supplement 1-V91)Psychological Reports, 2002
- Clarifications about taxometric methodApplied and Preventive Psychology, 1999
- Factors and Taxa, Traits and Types, Differences of Degree and Differences in KindJournal of Personality, 1992
- Author's ResponsePsychological Inquiry, 1990
- Appraising and Amending Theories: The Strategy of Lakatosian Defense and Two Principles that Warrant ItPsychological Inquiry, 1990
- Theoretical risks and tabular asterisks: Sir Karl, Sir Ronald, and the slow progress of soft psychology.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1978
- Testing a single dominant gene theory without an accepted criterion variableAnnals of Human Genetics, 1978
- Specific Etiology and Other Forms of Strong Influence: Some Quantitative MeaningsJournal of Medicine and Philosophy, 1977
- Schizotaxia, schizotypy, schizophrenia.American Psychologist, 1962
- Construct validity in psychological tests.Psychological Bulletin, 1955