CLIOMETRIC METATHEORY: II. CRITERIA SCIENTISTS USE IN THEORY APPRAISAL AND WHY IT IS RATIONAL TO DO SO (Monograph Supplement 1-V91)
- 1 October 2002
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Psychological Reports
- Vol. 91 (6)
- https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.91.6.339-404
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 29 references indexed in Scilit:
- Using Meta-Scientific Studies to Clarify or Resolve Questions in the Philosophy and History of SciencePhilosophy of Science, 2002
- A Gruesome Problem for the Curve-Fitting SolutionThe British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 1997
- The Golfer's Dilemma: A Reply to Kukla on Curve-FittingThe British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 1995
- How to Tell When Simpler, More Unified, or LessAd HocTheories will Provide More Accurate PredictionsThe British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 1994
- Using scientific methods to resolve questions in the history and philosophy of science: Some illustrationsBehavior Therapy, 1992
- The Division of Cognitive LaborThe Journal of Philosophy, 1990
- Realism, Underdetermination, and a Causal Theory of EvidenceNoûs, 1973
- The Inference to the Best ExplanationThe Philosophical Review, 1965
- Outcome of employing three techniques of psychotherapyJournal of Clinical Psychology, 1957
- Existential HypothesesPhilosophy of Science, 1950