Fluoroquinolone AUIC Break Points and the Link to Bacterial Killing Rates
- 1 September 2003
- journal article
- review article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Annals of Pharmacotherapy
- Vol. 37 (9) , 1287-1298
- https://doi.org/10.1345/aph.1c199
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To review in vitro and animal model studies with fluoroquinolones and the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic relationships that are predictive of clinical and microbiologic outcomes and resistance. Data on fluoroquinolones are summarized and examine the premise that a single area under the inhibitory concentration–time curve (AUIC) target >125 may be used for all fluoroquinolones with concentration-dependent killing actions and against all target organisms. DATA SOURCES: Primary articles were identified by MEDLINE search (1966–February 2002) and through secondary sources. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: All of the articles identified from the data sources were evaluated, and all information deemed relevant was included. DATA SYNTHESIS: The fluoroquinolones exhibit concentration-dependent killing. This effect clearly depends on concentrations achieved, and outcomes depend on endpoints established by individual investigators. With AUIC values 100 but 250 produce rapid killing, and bacterial eradication occurs within 24 hours. Disagreements regarding target endpoints are the expected consequences of comparing microbial and clinical outcomes across animal models, in vitro experiments, and humans when the endpoints are clearly not equivalent. Careful attention to time-related events, such as speed of bacterial killing, versus global endpoints, such as bacteriologic cure, allows optimal break points to be defined. CONCLUSIONS: Evidence from in vitro and animal models favors the use of AUIC values >250 for rapid bactericidal action, regardless of whether the organism is gram-negative or gram-positive.Keywords
This publication has 70 references indexed in Scilit:
- Animal model pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics: a critical reviewInternational Journal of Antimicrobial Agents, 2002
- ReplyClinical Infectious Diseases, 2001
- What Have We Learned from Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Theories?Clinical Infectious Diseases, 2001
- Comparative Bactericidal Activities of Ciprofloxacin, Clinafloxacin, Grepafloxacin, Levofloxacin, Moxifloxacin, and Trovafloxacin against Streptococcus pneumoniae in a Dynamic In Vitro ModelAntimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 2001
- Pharmacodynamic Comparisons of Levofloxacin, Ciprofloxacin, and Ampicillin against Streptococcus pneumoniae in an In Vitro Model of InfectionAntimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 1999
- Pharmacodynamics of LevofloxacinJAMA, 1998
- AUIC — A General Target for the Optimization of Dosing Regimens of Antibiotics?Annals of Pharmacotherapy, 1996
- The Importance of Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Surrogate Markers to OutcomeClinical Pharmacokinetics, 1995
- Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic activities of ciprofloxacin against strains of Streptococcus pneumoniae, Staphylococcus aureus, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa for which MICs are similarAntimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 1994
- Pharmacodynamics of intravenous ciprofloxacin in seriously ill patientsAntimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 1993