The Wells Rule Does Not Adequately Rule Out Deep Venous Thrombosis in Primary Care Patients
- 19 July 2005
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American College of Physicians in Annals of Internal Medicine
- Vol. 143 (2) , 100-107
- https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-143-2-200507190-00008
Abstract
Read the full review for this F1000Prime recommended article: The Wells rule does not adequately rule out deep venous thrombosis in primary care patients.Keywords
This publication has 36 references indexed in Scilit:
- Simplification of the Diagnostic Management of Suspected Deep Vein ThrombosisArchives of internal medicine (1960), 2002
- Clinical prediction of deep venous thrombosis using two risk assessment methods in combination with rapid quantitative D-dimer testingThe American Journal of Medicine, 2002
- Users' Guides to the Medical LiteratureJAMA, 2000
- Non-invasive diagnosis of venous thromboembolism in outpatientsThe Lancet, 1999
- Does This Patient Have Deep Vein Thrombosis?JAMA, 1998
- Value of assessment of pretest probability of deep-vein thrombosis in clinical managementThe Lancet, 1997
- MULTIVARIABLE PROGNOSTIC MODELS: ISSUES IN DEVELOPING MODELS, EVALUATING ASSUMPTIONS AND ADEQUACY, AND MEASURING AND REDUCING ERRORSStatistics in Medicine, 1996
- Accuracy of clinical assessment of deep-vein thrombosisThe Lancet, 1995
- The influence of referral patterns on the characteristics of diagnostic testsJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1992
- Clinical findings associated with acute proximal deep vein thrombosis: A basis for quantifying clinical judgmentThe American Journal of Medicine, 1990