Actions of Cholinergic Pharmacological Agents on the Cell Body Membrane of the Fast Coxal Depressor Motoneurone of the Cockroach (Periplaneta Americana)
Open Access
- 1 January 1984
- journal article
- Published by The Company of Biologists in Journal of Experimental Biology
- Vol. 108 (1) , 119-136
- https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.108.1.119
Abstract
The pharmacological properties of cholinergic receptors on the cell body membrane of the fast coxal depressor motoneurone (Df) of the cockroach (Periplaneta americana) have been investigated. Parallel dose-response curves were obtained for the depolarizing actions of four bath-applied agonists, with the following order of effectiveness: nicotine>acetylcholine (ACh), in the presence of 1.0×10−7M neostigmine>carbamylcholine>tetramethylammonium. By contrast, dimethyl-4-phenyl piperazinium, suberyldicholine, D,L-muscarine, oxotremorine, acetyl-β-methylcholine and sebacinylcholine were practically ineffective. Of the three putative receptor-specific ligands used to date in binding studies on insect CNS tissues, α-bungarotoxin (α-BGTX) was much more effective (I50 = 6.4×10−8M) in blocking the depolarization resulting from ionophoretic application of ACh, than either quinuclidinyl benzilate (QNB) (I50 = 1.6×10−4 M) or decamethonium (I50 × 2.8×10−3 M). The order of effectiveness of ligands that were particularly effective in blocking ACh depolarization was α-BGTX>α-cobratoxin (α-COTX)>mecamylamine>dihydro-)β-erythroidine>benzoquinonium. Less potent and almost equally effective were atropine, d-tubocurarine, pancuronium and quinuclidinyl benzilate. Even less effective were hexamethonium, gallamine, decamethonium and succinylcholine, all requiring concentrations of 1.0×10−3M and higher to produce a significant block of the ACh response. Not all reversibly acting antagonists were equally effective in preventing irreversible block of the ACh-induced depolarization by α-BGTX. Whereas α-COTX protected the receptors, mecamylamine did not. With the cell body of Df voltage-clamped, the degree of antagonism of the ACh-induced current was assessed at potentials in the range −120 mV to −60 mV. α-BGTX, dihydro-β-erythroidine, benzoquinonium, QNB and decamethonium appeared to be voltage-independent over this potential range, whereas d-tubocurarine and atropine were strongly voltage-dependent in their blocking actions. Sites of action of cholinergic antagonists at the insect ACh receptor/ion channel complex are discussed.Keywords
This publication has 47 references indexed in Scilit:
- Acetylcholine Receptors of Identified Insect NeuronsPublished by Wiley ,1982
- Muscarinic cholinergic binding sites in an orthopteran central nervous systemJournal of Neurobiology, 1980
- PROPERTIES OF A PUTATIVE MUSCARINIC CHOLTNERGIC RECEPTOR FROM DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTERJournal of Neurochemistry, 1979
- Insect acetylcholine receptors as a site of insecticide actionNature, 1978
- The action of putative transmitters and related compounds on neurones in the abdominal ganglia of the horse-shoe crab, Limulus polyphemusNeuropharmacology, 1978
- Use of Alpha- and Beta-Bungarotoxins for the Study of Neuromuscular TransmissionAnesthesiology, 1978
- Porperties of an α-bungarotoxin-binding cholinergic nicotinic receptor from drosophila melanogasterBiochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - General Subjects, 1978
- Voltage sensitivity of acetylcholine currents in Aplysia neurones in the presence of curareNature, 1976
- Electrical Responses of Insect Central Neurons: Augmentation by Nerve Section or ColchicineScience, 1972
- The actions of some muscarinic and nicotinic agonists on the Retzius cells of the leechComparative and General Pharmacology, 1971