Strategies for Improving Surgical Quality — Should Payers Reward Excellence or Effort?
- 23 February 2006
- journal article
- Published by Massachusetts Medical Society in New England Journal of Medicine
- Vol. 354 (8) , 864-870
- https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmsb053364
Abstract
Payers are pursuing three strategies to improve surgical care. The centers-of-excellence approach steers patients to doctors and hospitals with low surgical morbidity and mortality. Pay for performance offers financial incentives to improve processes, such as preoperative administration of antibiotics. In pay for participation, payers provide resources to allow hospitals and surgeons to collaborate to improve the quality of care. The authors argue that the pay-for-participation approach offers the greatest potential for improving surgical quality.Keywords
This publication has 39 references indexed in Scilit:
- Care in U.S. Hospitals — The Hospital Quality Alliance ProgramNew England Journal of Medicine, 2005
- Potential benefits of the new Leapfrog standards: effect of process and outcomes measuresSurgery, 2004
- Paying For Quality: Providers’ Incentives For Quality ImprovementHealth Affairs, 2004
- Surgeon Volume and Operative Mortality in the United StatesNew England Journal of Medicine, 2003
- Excess Length of Stay, Charges, and Mortality Attributable to Medical Injuries During HospitalizationJAMA, 2003
- Change in the Quality of Care Delivered to Medicare Beneficiaries, 1998-1999 to 2000-2001JAMA, 2003
- Hospital Volume and Surgical Mortality in the United StatesNew England Journal of Medicine, 2002
- The Comparative Assessment and Improvement of Quality of Surgical Care in the Department of Veterans AffairsArchives of Surgery, 2002
- A regional prospective study of in-hospital mortality associated with coronary artery bypass grafting. The Northern New England Cardiovascular Disease Study GroupJAMA, 1991
- Adult open heart surgery in New York State. An analysis of risk factors and hospital mortality ratesJAMA, 1990