Going Public without Governance: Managerial Reputation Effects
Top Cited Papers
- 1 April 2000
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in The Journal of Finance
- Vol. 55 (2) , 615-646
- https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-1082.00221
Abstract
This paper addresses the agency problem between controlling shareholders and minority shareholders. This problem is common among public firms in many countries where the legal system does not effectively protect minority shareholders against oppression by controlling shareholders. We show that even without any explicit corporate governance mechanisms protecting minority shareholders, controlling shareholders can implicitly commit not to expropriate them. Stock prices of such companies are significantly higher and firms are more likely go public because of this reputation effect. Moreover, insiders divest shares gradually over time, at a rate that is negatively related to the degree of moral hazard.Keywords
This publication has 50 references indexed in Scilit:
- Outside EquityThe Journal of Finance, 2000
- Going public and the ownership structure of the firmJournal of Financial Economics, 1998
- IPO-mechanisms, monitoring and ownership structureJournal of Financial Economics, 1998
- The Choice of Stock Ownership Structure: Agency Costs, Monitoring, and the Decision to Go PublicThe Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1998
- Efficient and Inefficient Sales of Corporate ControlThe Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1994
- Private benefits from block ownership and discounts on closed-end fundsJournal of Financial Economics, 1993
- The Pricing of Initial Public Offerings: A Dynamic Model with Information ProductionThe Journal of Finance, 1993
- Differentiated bids for voting and restricted voting shares in public tender offersJournal of Banking & Finance, 1992
- Reputation Acquisition in Debt MarketsJournal of Political Economy, 1989
- Signaling Games and Stable EquilibriaThe Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1987