Abstract
Previous articles in the Journal cited by the author have argued that some children either have insufficient intelligence or lack readiness for first-grade work, despite an appropriate chronological age. Retainment or delayed entry have been suggested as remedies. Gredler presents arguments and supporting data which seriously question these otherwise reasonable assertions. Those concerned at this time of year with decisions of retainment or delayed entry should find this article thought-provoking. — G.M.S. There has been an increased interest in the learning disabled child and the need for sophisticated diagnosis and remediation. However, many still believe that manipulation of the entrance age to school and grade retention will solve the problems of children retarded in reading. The efficacy of these approaches is analyzed. There is a need to examine the excessively high failure rate found in the primary grades and reconceptualize the factors involved in such failure.

This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit: