The Influence of Endocardial Electrode Fixation Status on Acute and Chronic Atrial Stimulation Threshold and Atrial Endocardial Electrogram Amplitude
- 1 September 1990
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology
- Vol. 13 (9) , 1116-1122
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-8159.1990.tb02168.x
Abstract
The endocardial atrial electrogram or "P wave amplitude" (PWA) and pacemaker atrial stimulation thresholds are important parameters determining correct pacing system function. Pacemaker lead fixation mechanism and lead age may negatively influence these parameters. Therefore, we compared acute and chronic PWA and atrial stimulation thresholds in 33 patients with permanent transvenous atrial screw-in leads, follow-up 647 days +/- 297 days; and in 31 patients with nonscrew leads, follow-up 855 days +/- 512 days (P = ns). The PWA differed between the two lead types acutely (1.97 mV +/- 0.8 mV for screw-in versus 2.48 mV +/- 1.1 mV for nonscrew-in leads; P less than 0.05), but not chronically (2.21 mV +/- 0.8 mV vs 2.2 mV +/- 1.2 mV; P = ns). Acute and chronic atrial pacing thresholds did not differ between groups. We also analyzed an early interim PWA in a subgroup of patients (mean 31 days after implantation). The nonscrew fixation group interim PWA was 1.76 mV +/- 0.9 mV versus 2.7 mV +/- 1.2 mV at implant (P less than 0.001). The screw-in lead interim PWA was 2.04 mV +/- 0.9 mV versus 1.97 mV +/- 0.7 mV at implant (P = ns). (1) A significantly higher endocardial PWA occurs at the time of lead implantation in nonscrew versus screw-in lead groups, but the chronic PWA does not differ between the two groups. (2) A transient but marked early (mean approximately 31 days) attenuation of the PWA occurs only with nonscrew-in leads. (3) Atrial threshold stimulation energies do not differ between the two lead groups acutely or during follow-up.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Active Fixation Atrial Leads: Randomized Comparison of Two Lead DesignsPacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 1989
- Cellular electrophysiologic effects of dexamethasone sodium phosphate: implications for cardiac stimulation with steroid-eluting electrodesInternational Journal of Cardiology, 1989
- Reliability of Atrial Screw‐in LeadsPacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 1988
- Paired Comparisons of Steroid-Eluting and Nonsteroid Endocardial Pacemaker Leads in Dogs: Electrical Performance and Morphologic AlterationsPacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 1988
- Target Lead—Low Threshold ElectrodePacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 1986
- Acute and Long‐Term Atrial and Ventricular Stimulation Thresholds with a Steroid‐Eluting ElectrodePacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 1985
- Comparison of Pacing Electrodes of Different Shape and Material—RecommendationsPacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 1983
- Electrode‐Heart Interface: Definition of the Ideal ElectrodePacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 1983
- Self-anchoring endocardial pacemaker leads: Current spectrum of types, advances in design, and clinical resultsAmerican Heart Journal, 1981
- Myocardial threshold in patients with artificial pacemakersThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1966