RECOVERY FROM DAY-CASE ANAESTHESIA: COMPARISON OF A FURTHER FOUR TECHNIQUES INCLUDING USE OF THE NEW INDUCTION AGENT DIPRIVAN
- 1 June 1982
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in British Journal of Anaesthesia
- Vol. 54 (6) , 629-633
- https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/54.6.629
Abstract
Eighty unpremedicated patients received thiopentone and halothane, propanidid and fentanyl, diprivan (ICI 35 868) alone or diprivan and fentanyl, each supplementing 66% N2O in O2. Diprivan alone, or in combination with fentanyl, resulted in a more rapid awakening than thiopentone and halothane and significantly shorter recovery times than both thiopentone and halothane and propranidid and fentanyl. Administration of fentanyl with diprivan significantly reduced the total dose of the latter and all indices of recovery. Propanidid and fentanyl did not produce shorter overall recovery times than thiopentone and halothane, but nausea and vomiting after operation were significantly increased when compared with the other techniques.This publication has 2 references indexed in Scilit:
- An evaluation of the anaesthetic techniques used in an outpatient unitCanadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie, 1977
- CLINICAL STUDIES OF INDUCTION AGENTS IX: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF A NEW EUGENOL DERIVATIVE, FBA.1420, WITH G.29.505 AND STANDARD BARBITURATESBritish Journal of Anaesthesia, 1964