A Comparison of Intranasal and Oral Flunisolide in the Therapy of Allergic Rhinitis

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
Intranasal flunisolide is an effective treatment for allergic rhinitis. Flunisolide has high bioavailability when administered to normal subjects (50 % of an intranasal dose reaches the systemic circulation) with minimal systemic effects. Bioavailability in patients with active rhinitis averages 62.4 ± 15.7%. The oral dose bioequivalent to 100 μg intranasally is 500 μg. To define the comparative trial and systemic effects of intranasal flunisolide in patients with active allergic rhinitis, a multicenter, randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled study was conducted during the 1983 ragweed hayfever season. Ninety‐nine patients with ragweed hayfever for ≥2 years and positive prick skin tests to ragweed were randomly allocated to one of three treatment groups: 0 = oral flunisolide 500 μg b.i.d. and intranasal placebo b.i.d.; N = intranasal flunisolide 50 μg per nostril b.i.d. and oral placebo b.i.d.; P = intranasal and oral placebo b.i.d. Treatment continued for 4 weeks. Patients kept daily symptom scores. Patients were evaluated by a blinded observer every 2 weeks and were globally evaluated at the study's end. Data were analyzed for each center and pooled. There were no significant differences in symptom severity of sneezing, nasal congestion, and throat itch in the 0 (oral flunisolide) and P (placebo) groups. N (nasal flunisolide) was significantly more effective than 0 or P (P ≤= 0.005) for each symptom for at least one 2‐week period. Global evaluation demonstrated control of overall hayfever severity for N (nasal flunisolide) but not for 0 (oral flunisolide). We conclude that the therapeutic efficacy of flunisolide is achieved by topical and not by systemic action.