Interpretation of nonstress tests by an artificial neural network
- 1 May 1995
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Elsevier in American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
- Vol. 172 (5) , 1372-1379
- https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9378(95)90465-4
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- A comparison between visual and computer analysis of antepartum fetal heart rate tracingsAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1993
- Comparison of the Interpretation of Antepartum Fetal Heart Rate Tracings Between a Computer Program and ExpertsObstetrical & Gynecological Survey, 1992
- The use of a neural network for the ultrasonographic estimation of fetal weight in the macrosomic fetusAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1992
- The advantages of computerized fetal heart rate analysisjpme, 1991
- Use of an Artificial Neural Network for Data Analysis in Clinical Decision-Making: The Diagnosis of Acute Coronary OcclusionNeural Computation, 1990
- Approximation by superpositions of a sigmoidal functionMathematics of Control, Signals, and Systems, 1989
- Learning representations by back-propagating errorsNature, 1986
- Assessing the Diagnostic Accuracy and Efficacy of Selected Antepartum Fetal Surveillance TechniquesObstetrical & Gynecological Survey, 1986
- OBSERVER VARIABILITY IN ASSESSMENT OF ANTEPARTUM CARDIOTOCOGRAMSBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1978
- Antenatal Fetal Heart Rate MonitoringAustralian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1975