Defining Reading and Writing Disabilities with and without IQ: A Flexible, Developmental Perspective
- 1 May 1992
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Learning Disability Quarterly
- Vol. 15 (2) , 103-118
- https://doi.org/10.2307/1511012
Abstract
We compared three approaches to defining disabilities on predictor developmental measures related to reading and writing and on criterion reading and writing measures in an unreferred sample of 300 first, second, and third graders. For each measure, the children who fell in the lowest 5% of the normal distribution (based on the mean and standard deviation for grade) were assigned to the low-functioning group; those children who, based on the Mahalanobis statistic (.05 level, one-tail test), were significantly different from and below their VIQ were assigned to the underachieving group; finally, children who met the criterion for both underachieving and low functioning were assigned to the learning disabled group. Of the low-functioning group, 44% were learning disabled (also discrepant from their VIQ). Of the underachievers, 36% were learning disabled (also very low functioning). Thus, elimination of IQ in the definition of learning disabilities (as Siegel [1989] and Stanovich [1991] have recommended) would dramatically affect who is identified as learning disabled. We argue for a two-stage assessment model (cf. Leong, 1987) in which (a) absolute criteria without IQ are first used by classroom teachers to identify children who are low functioning in orthographic coding, phonological coding, word finding, fine motor, and visual-motor integration and who would benefit from early intervention to prevent reading and writing disabilities; and (b) relative criteria with IQ are subsequently used in more comprehensive psychoeducational assessment for learning disabled children whose problems persist despite early intervention. Based on our findings, we recommend that, in future research on reading and writing disabilities, investigators differentiate among low-functioning, underachieving, and learning disabled (low-functioning and underachieving) children and among component reading and writing skills.Keywords
This publication has 33 references indexed in Scilit:
- Multiple orthographic codes in reading and writing acquisitionReading and Writing, 1991
- Scientific practitionerJournal of School Psychology, 1991
- Effects of a two-phase reading intervention on three orthographic-phonological code connectionsLearning and Individual Differences, 1991
- Overview of “bridging the gap between developmental, neuropsychological, and cognitive approaches to reading”Learning and Individual Differences, 1991
- Levels of Analysis in Interdisciplinary Child AssessmentJournal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 1988
- A Test of the Multiple Connections Model of Reading AcquisitionInternational Journal of Neuroscience, 1988
- Preventing Reading Disabilities by Assessing and Remediating Phonemic SkillsSchool Psychology Review, 1987
- Global, component, and serial processing of printed words in beginning readingJournal of Experimental Child Psychology, 1987
- Normal Variation in Reading AcquisitionPerceptual and Motor Skills, 1986
- Development of Speed in Repetitive and Successive Finger‐movements in Normal ChildrenDevelopmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 1973