Beauty and Breast Implantation: How Candidate Selection Affects Autonomy and Informed Consent
- 1 January 1995
- journal article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Hypatia
- Vol. 10 (1) , 183-201
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.1995.tb01359.x
Abstract
Candidate evaluation for breast implantation presents a more important obstacle to the fulfillment of the normative requirements of informed consent than do the social roles of women or cultural norms governing female beauty. I argue that women's decisions to receive breast implants may indeed be informed, competently made, and substantially voluntary, but that the cultural construction of beauty may undermine women's autonomy by influencing the evaluation of surgical candidates and risk disclosure during informed consent.Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Risk of Connective-Tissue Diseases and Other Disorders after Breast ImplantationNew England Journal of Medicine, 1994
- Breast implant settlementThe Lancet, 1994
- Caring for Women's Health -- What Is the Problem?New England Journal of Medicine, 1993
- Antibodies to silicone elastomers and reactions to ventriculoperitoneal shuntsThe Lancet, 1992
- The Basis of the FDA's Decision on Breast ImplantsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1992
- Breast Implants — Protection or Paternalism?New England Journal of Medicine, 1992
- Accounting for Cosmetic Surgery: The Accomplishment of GenderSocial Problems, 1991
- Remaking the She-Devil: A Critical Look at Feminist Approaches to BeautyHypatia, 1991
- Connective-Tissue Disease Following Breast AugmentationPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 1988
- Augmentation Mammaplasty: A Surgical and Psychiatric Evaluation of the ResultsAnnals of Plastic Surgery, 1979