Haemoglobin and haematocrit: the threefold conversion is also non valid for assessing anaemia in Plasmodium vivax malaria-endemic settings
Open Access
- 17 December 2007
- journal article
- Published by Springer Nature in Malaria Journal
- Vol. 6 (1) , 166
- https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-6-166
Abstract
It has been recently reported that the standard threefold conversion from haematocrit to haemoglobin underestimates the prevalence of anaemia and low levels of haemoglobin in children living in areas endemic for Plasmodium falciparum malaria. The data presented herein describes the experience in a malaria-endemic zone in northeastern Venezuela (state of Sucre), where a similar bias between haematocrit and haemoglobin in patients with Plasmodium vivax infection was found. In summary, the relationship between haematocrit and haemoglobin needs to be specifically evaluated according to each particular region or epidemiological setting.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Haemoglobin and haematocrit: is the threefold conversion valid for assessing anaemia in malaria-endemic settings?Malaria Journal, 2007
- Relationship between haemoglobin and haematocrit in the definition of anaemiaTropical Medicine & International Health, 2006
- White Blood Cell Counts inPlasmodium vivaxMalariaThe Journal of Infectious Diseases, 2005
- Occurrence of Thrombocytopenia in Plasmodium vivax MalariaClinical Infectious Diseases, 2005
- Anemia and Thrombocytopenia in Children with Plasmodium vivax MalariaJournal of Tropical Pediatrics, 2005
- Measuring agreement in method comparison studiesStatistical Methods in Medical Research, 1999
- Measuring agreement in method comparison studiesStatistical Methods in Medical Research, 1999
- Hemoglobin and hematocrit: an analysis of clinical accuracy. Case study of the anemic patient.1998
- STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENTThe Lancet, 1986
- Hemoglobins and hematocrits: are they equally sensitive in detecting anemias?The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 1981