Grading evidence and recommendations for clinical practice guidelines in nephrology. A position statement from Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO)
- 1 December 2006
- journal article
- practice guideline
- Published by Elsevier in Kidney International
- Vol. 70 (12) , 2058-2065
- https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ki.5001875
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Clinical Practice Guidelines in nephrology—for worse or for betterNephrology Dialysis Transplantation, 2006
- Identifying outcome reporting bias in randomised trials on PubMed: review of publications and survey of authorsBMJ, 2005
- Evidence Based? Caveat Emptor!Health Affairs, 2005
- Better Reporting of Harms in Randomized Trials: An Extension of the CONSORT StatementAnnals of Internal Medicine, 2004
- Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendationsBMJ, 2004
- Clinical Trial in Nephrology at Hard End Point?Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, 2004
- Assessing the quality of researchBMJ, 2004
- Kidney Disease as a Risk Factor for Development of Cardiovascular DiseaseHypertension, 2003
- Effect of applying different “levels of evidence” criteria on conclusions of Cochrane reviews of interventions for low back painJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2002
- Publication bias in meta-analysis its causes and consequencesJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2000