Lay conceptions of the ethical and scientific justifications for random allocation in clinical trials

This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:

• Randomisation in trials: do potential trial participants understand it and find it acceptable?
  Journal of Medical Ethics, 2004
• “Why don’t they just tell me straight, why allocate it?” The struggle to make sense of participating in a randomised controlled trial
  Social Science & Medicine, 2002
• Equipoise, Knowledge and Ethics in Clinical Research and Practice
  Bioethics, 1999
• Shortcomings of the randomized controlled trial: a view from the boondocks
  Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 1998
• Informed consent, parental awareness, and reasons for participating in a randomised controlled study
  Archives of Disease in Childhood, 1998
• Equipoise as a means of managing uncertainty: personal, communal and proxy.
  Journal of Medical Ethics, 1996
• Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials
  JAMA, 1995
• Investigating Pediatric HIV Research Ethics in the Field
  Western Journal of Nursing Research, 1994
• At what level of collective equipoise does a clinical trial become ethical?
  Journal of Medical Ethics, 1991
• Equipoise and the Ethics of Clinical Research
  New England Journal of Medicine, 1987