Evaluation of the acute scarring response to the implant of different types of biomaterial in the abdominal wall
- 1 January 2000
- journal article
- Published by Springer Nature in Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine
- Vol. 11 (1) , 25-29
- https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1008981517743
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Use of nonporous polytetrafluoroethylene prosthesis in combination with polypropylene prosthetic abdominal wall implants in prevention of peritoneal adhesionsJournal of Biomedical Materials Research, 1997
- Comparison of a new type of polytetrafluoroethylene patch (Mycro Mesh) and polypropylene prosthesis (Marlex) for repair of abdominal wall defects.1996
- Experimental assay of a Dual Mesh® polytetrafluoroethylene prosthesis (non-porous on one side) in the repair of abdominal wall defectsBiomaterials, 1996
- Integration of biomaterials implanted into abdominal wall: process of scar formation and macrophage responseBiomaterials, 1995
- Experimental evaluation of a new composite mesh with the selective property of incorporation to the abdominal wall without adhering to the intestinesJournal of Biomedical Materials Research, 1994
- Macrophage Response to Experimental Implantation of Polypropylene ProsthesesEuropean Surgical Research, 1994
- Double-Layer Prostheses for Repair of Abdominal Wall Defects in a Rabbit ModelJournal of Surgical Research, 1993
- Expanded polytetrafluoroethylene patch versus polypropylene mesh for the repair of contaminated defects of the abdominal wall.1993
- A Comparison of Intraperitoneal Prostheses for the Repair of Abdominal Muscular Wall Defects in RatsEuropean Surgical Research, 1992
- Comparison of Prosthetic Materials for Abdominal Wall Reconstruction in the Presence of Contamination and InfectionAnnals of Surgery, 1985