When Politeness is Fatal
- 1 July 1992
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Journal of Business and Technical Communication
- Vol. 6 (3) , 269-292
- https://doi.org/10.1177/1050651992006003001
Abstract
Severe icing on the space shuttle Challenger's launch pad should have halted the launch on the morning of January 28, 1986. One Rockwell International manager told his subordinates to be sure NASA knew that Rockwell thought a launch was not safe. When the Rockwell subordinates spoke directly to NASA managers, however, they used politeness strategies like those enumerated by Penelope Brown and Stephen Levinson to blur the directness of the Rockwell manager's message. The NASA managers interpreted the politeness of the Rockwell subordinates as meaning it was safe to launch. The Rockwell subordinates did not mean it that way, but the Challenger was launched.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Moving Beyond the Academic CommunityWritten Communication, 1990
- Linguistic Politeness in Professional ProseWritten Communication, 1989
- Communication: the Missing Link in the Challenger DisasterThe Bulletin of the Association for Business Communication, 1988
- Technical Communication, Group Differentiation, and the Decision to Launch the Space Shuttle ChallengerJournal of Technical Writing and Communication, 1988
- Politeness in written persuasionJournal of Pragmatics, 1988
- Communication failures contributing to the Challenger accident: an example for technical communicatorsIEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing, 1988
- Frameworks for the Study of Writing in Organizational ContextsWritten Communication, 1987
- The challenger tragedy and search for legitimacyCentral States Speech Journal, 1986
- The relationship between the public and the technical spheres of argument: A case study of the challenger seven disasterCentral States Speech Journal, 1986