Linguistic Politeness in Professional Prose
- 1 July 1989
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Written Communication
- Vol. 6 (3) , 312-339
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088389006003004
Abstract
Consonant with a trend toward investigating professional writing in naturalistic settings, this discourse-analytical study of a corpus of “suggestion letters” written in a Big Eight accounting firm demonstrates how auditors use negative politeness strategies to meet the complex demands of potentially threatening interactional situations. The study substantiates Brown and Levinson's claim that politeness is a linguistic universal by showing that the same politeness strategies found in speech also occur in written communication. Analysis of negative message strategies in ten leading textbooks shows that business communication pedagogy needs to modify strictures on the use of passives, nominalizations, expletive constructions, and hedging particles in light of research on the exigencies of real-world linguistic interaction.Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Spurious Paternity of Business Communication PrinciplesInternational Journal of Business Communication, 1989
- Politeness in written persuasionJournal of Pragmatics, 1988
- Pragmatics, "Situated" Language, and Business CommunicationIowa State Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 1987
- How Effectively Does the "New" Accountant Communicate? Perceptions by Practitioners and AcademicsInternational Journal of Business Communication, 1984
- Readability of Accounting and Auditing MessagesInternational Journal of Business Communication, 1979
- Making Business Communication Courses Academically RespectableABCA Bulletin, 1979
- The Case for a New Model of Business CommunicationInternational Journal of Business Communication, 1977
- Measurement of Meaning in Financial ReportsJournal of Accounting Research, 1973
- The Semantic Dimensions of Financial StatementsJournal of Accounting Research, 1972
- Utterer's Meaning and IntentionThe Philosophical Review, 1969