Abolishing the effect of reinforcement delay on human causal learning
Open Access
- 1 April 2004
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology
- Vol. 57 (2b) , 179-191
- https://doi.org/10.1080/02724990344000123
Abstract
Associative learning theory postulates two main determinants for human causal learning: contingency and contiguity. In line with such an account, participants in Shanks, Pearson, and Dickinson (1989) failed to discover causal relations involving delays of more than two seconds. More recent research has shown that the impact of contiguity and delay is mediated by prior knowledge about the timeframe of the causal relation in question. Buehner and May (2002, 2003) demonstrated that the detrimental effect of delay can be significantly reduced if reasoners are aware of potential delays. Here we demonstrate for the first time that the negative influence of delay can be abolished completely by a subtle change in the experimental instructions. Temporal contiguity is thus not essential for human causal learning.Keywords
This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- Rethinking Temporal Contiguity and the Judgement of Causality: Effects of Prior Knowledge, Experience, and Reinforcement ProcedureThe Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 2003
- Knowledge mediates the timeframe of covariation assessment in human causal inductionThinking & Reasoning, 2002
- The 28th Bartlett Memorial Lecture Causal learning: An associative analysisThe Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 2001
- Time, rate, and conditioning.Psychological Review, 2000
- From covariation to causation: A causal power theory.Psychological Review, 1997
- Causal inferences as perceptual judgmentsMemory & Cognition, 1995
- The role of covariation versus mechanism information in causal attributionCognition, 1995
- Cue interaction in human contingency judgmentMemory & Cognition, 1990
- Judging probable cause.Psychological Bulletin, 1986
- Learning with prolonged delay of reinforcementPsychonomic Science, 1966