Reproducibility of neurophysiological and myometric measurement in the ulnar nerve–abductor digiti minimi system
- 13 September 2001
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Muscle & Nerve
- Vol. 24 (10) , 1391-1395
- https://doi.org/10.1002/mus.1161
Abstract
Reliability in strength and neurophysiological measurements is important in evaluating progression of neuromuscular diseases. No data are available on the variability of neurophysiological parameters as compared with maximal voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC) in the same muscles, in healthy subjects. A control population of 26 healthy subjects was studied twice on different days. We evaluated the reliability of neurophysiological parameters obtained from bilateral ulnar nerve stimulation, recording the response over the abductor digiti minimi (ADM) muscle, including distal motor latency, compound muscle potential amplitude and area, F-wave frequency and mean F-wave latency, and the derived neurophysiological index that we have described previously. MVIC force was measured in each session in both ADM muscles. The variances between the grouped data obtained in the two recording sessions were identical, indicating a low intrinsic variability with this experimental methodology. Comparison of the mean values obtained in the two sessions revealed no statistically significant differences. The reliability of these neurophysiological and strength measurements in the same nerve/muscle system suggests they may be useful in comparing the dynamics of weakness and neurophysiological change in neuromuscular disease. © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Muscle Nerve 24: 1391–1395, 2001Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- The split hand in ALS has a cortical basisJournal of the Neurological Sciences, 2000
- A comparison of three measures of disease progression in ALSJournal of the Neurological Sciences, 1996
- Accuracy, reproducibility, and variability of hand-held dynamometry in motor neuron disease.Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 1994
- Motor unit number estimation, isometric strength, and electromyographic measures in amyotrophic lateral sclerosisMuscle & Nerve, 1993
- Relationship of manual muscle testing to objective strength measurementsMuscle & Nerve, 1989
- Quantitative motor assessment in amyotrophic lateral sclerosisNeurology, 1986
- F-response behaviour in a control population.Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 1985
- Measuring muscle strengthZeitschrift für Neurologie, 1984
- The measurement of muscle strength in patients with peripheral neuromuscular disorders.Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 1983
- Vulnerability of lower brachial myotomes in motor neurone diseaseJournal of the Neurological Sciences, 1980