Meptazinol versus pethidine for postoperative pain relief in children
- 1 March 1986
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Wiley in Anaesthesia
- Vol. 41 (3) , 263-267
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2044.1986.tb12785.x
Abstract
A double-blind, randomised, clinical trial was undertaken comparing intramuscular meptazinol (1 mg/kg) with intramuscular pethidine (1 mg/kg) for the relief of post-tonsillectomy pain, in 100 children under 15 years of age. Pethidine provided better analgesia in those patients who were awake after 30 minutes, but thereafter no statistically significant differences between the degree of pain relief could be detected. Meptazinol caused less sedation than pethidine, in that significantly more patients were awake after 40 minutes in the meptazinol group. The incidence of nausea and vomiting was similar in patients of both groups.Keywords
This publication has 4 references indexed in Scilit:
- Plasma ranitidine concentrations after intravenous administration in normal volunteers and haemodialysis patientsPostgraduate Medical Journal, 1983
- Double‐blind comparison of meptazinol and pethidine in labourBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1982
- A COMPARISON OF THE RESPIRATORY EFFECTS OF MEPTAZINAOL PENTAZOCINE AND MORPHINEBritish Journal of Anaesthesia, 1979
- A review of the biological properties and metabolic disposition of the new analgesic agent, meptazinolGeneral Pharmacology: The Vascular System, 1978