Multiple-dose pharmacokinetics of intravenously administered cefoperazone and sulbactam when given in combination to infected, seriously ill, elderly patients
- 1 May 1988
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Society for Microbiology in Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
- Vol. 32 (5) , 730-735
- https://doi.org/10.1128/aac.32.5.730
Abstract
The pharmacokinetics of cefoperazone and sulbactam in combination were evaluated in six, elderly, seriously ill patients treated with the drug combination for intra-abdominal infections. After giving informed consent, three males and three females aged 63.5 to 77.5 (mean 67.9) years and weighing 54.5 to 86.8 (mean, 67.6) kg were treated with cefoperazone (2.0 g) and sulbactam (1.0 g) infused intravenously every 12 h for at least 5 days. Cefoperazone and sulbactam pharmacokinetics were characterized on both days 1 and 5 of treatment. Eleven serial blood samples were obtained just prior to and following dose 1 on days 1 and 5 of treatment. Mean estimates of cefoperazone maximal concentration in plasma (Cmax), area under the curve of drug concentration in plasma versus time (AUC), half-life (t 1/2), apparent volume of distribution by the area method (Varea), apparent volume of distribution at steady state (Vss), and total body clearance (CL) for day 1 (day 5) were 297.5 237.5) micrograms/ml, 1,247 (1,063) micrograms.h/ml, 7.0 (4.9) h, 16.1 (13.4) liter, 13.1 (14.4) liter, and 28.9 (34.2) ml/min, respectively. Day 1 (day 5) mean values for sulbactam Cmax, AUC, t 1/2, Varea, Vss, and CL were 110.3 (78.0) micrograms/ml, 228 (217) micrograms.h/ml, 3.4 (2.5) h, 26.1 (18.5) liter, 18.9 (15.4) liter, and 97 (94) ml/min, respectively. Both drugs evidenced slower elimination and greater pharmacokinetic variability in these patients compared with values previously reported for normal volunteers. As patients improved during the course of therapy, the only pharmacokinetic parameter significantly changed between days 1 and 5 was a shortened sulbactam t 1/2. Our inability to find substantial evidence of pharmacokinetic normalization may have been related to sample size and study duration. Both drugs were present in potentially therapeutic concentrations for the entire 12-h dosing interval, but without undue accumulation from days 1 to 5.This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Pharmacokinetics of cefoperazone (2.0 g) and sulbactam (1.0 g) coadministered to subjects with normal renal function, patients with decreased renal function, and patients with end-stage renal disease on hemodialysisAntimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 1988
- Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of cefoperazone-sulbactam in patients on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysisAntimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 1988
- Multiple-dose pharmacokinetics and toleration of intravenously administered cefoperazone and sulbactam when given as single agents or in combinationAntimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 1988
- A Rapid, Universal TI-59 Model-Independent Pharmacokinetic Analysis Program based on Statistical Moment TheoryDrug Intelligence & Clinical Pharmacy, 1985
- Computation of Model-Independent Pharmacokinetic Parameters During Multiple DosingJournal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 1984
- Steady-state moxalactam pharmacokinetics in patients: Noncompartmental versus two-compartmental analysisJournal of Pharmacokinetics and Biopharmaceutics, 1983
- Inhibition kinetics of three R-factor-mediated β-lactamases by a new β-lactam sulfone (CP 45899)Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Enzymology, 1980
- Single-dose pharmacokinetics of cefoperazone following intravenous administration.1980
- Protein Binding of AntimicrobialsClinical Pharmacokinetics, 1977
- Prediction of Creatinine Clearance from Serum CreatinineNephron, 1976