Can Behavioral Adaptation Explain the Probing Effect? Rejoinder to Buller et al.
- 1 June 1996
- journal article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Human Communication Research
- Vol. 22 (4) , 604-613
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1996.tb00382.x
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Behavioral Adaptation in Deceptive Transactions Fact or Fiction: Reply to Levine and McCornackHuman Communication Research, 1996
- A Critical Analysis of the Behavioral Adaptation Explanation of the Probing EffectHuman Communication Research, 1996
- Interpersonal DeceptionHuman Communication Research, 1995
- The role of relational information in the production of deceptive messagesCommunication Reports, 1995
- Interpersonal Deception VIIJournal of Language and Social Psychology, 1994
- Individual Differences and Changes in Nonverbal BehaviorCommunication Research, 1994
- Linking Love and Lies: A Formal Test of the Mccornack and Parks Model of Deception DetectionJournal of Social and Personal Relationships, 1992
- Interpersonal deception: II. The inferiority of conversational participants as deception detectorsCommunication Monographs, 1991
- Interpersonal deception: I. Deceivers’ reactions to receivers’ suspicions and probingCommunication Monographs, 1991
- When lovers become leery: The relationship between suspicion and accuracy in detecting deceptionCommunication Monographs, 1990