Economic Transition, Institutional Changes and the Health System: Some Lessons from Rural China
- 30 July 2007
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of Economic Policy Reform
- Vol. 10 (3) , 209-231
- https://doi.org/10.1080/17487870701446033
Abstract
The success of China in its transition has received a great deal of attention from economists. At the same time, public health experts have accumulated evidence on setbacks within the Chinese health sector, particularly in rural areas. This paper puts these two bodies of knowledge together. It explores the links between the two phenomena. The review shows that economic transition, the ‘Chinese way’, creates specific challenges for the rural health sector. It also invites transition experts to pay more attention to health. There is a need for more studies on how health system development is influenced by economic and public finance reforms.Keywords
This publication has 55 references indexed in Scilit:
- Incentives for CEOs with multitasks: Evidence from Chinese state-owned enterprisesJournal of Comparative Economics, 2005
- Health sector reform and reproductive health services in poor rural ChinaHealth Policy and Planning, 2004
- Market reform: a challenge to public health?the case of schistosomiasis control in ChinaThe International Journal of Health Planning and Management, 2004
- Share Ownership and Employee Attitudes: Some Evidence from China's Postprivatization Rural IndustryJournal of Comparative Economics, 2002
- Health equity in transition from planned to market economy in ChinaHealth Policy and Planning, 2002
- Federalism with and without Political Centralization: China versus RussiaPublished by National Bureau of Economic Research ,2000
- From federalism, Chinese style to privatization, Chinese styleEconomics of Transition, 1999
- Health sector reform: Lessons from ChinaSocial Science & Medicine, 1997
- Cooperative medical schemes in contemporary rural ChinaSocial Science & Medicine, 1995
- Separation of Ownership and ControlThe Journal of Law and Economics, 1983