Developing a Forced-Choice Measure of Conflict-Handling Behavior: The "Mode" Instrument
- 1 July 1977
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Educational and Psychological Measurement
- Vol. 37 (2) , 309-325
- https://doi.org/10.1177/001316447703700204
Abstract
This paper describes the rationale and development of a new measure of five interpersonal conflict-handling modes (competing, collaborating, compromising, avoiding, and accommodating), which attempts to control for the social desirability response bias. The instrument is entitled: "Management-of-Differences Exercise," or the MODE instrument. The results of this study indicate that the new instrument significantly reduces the social desirability bias for overall population tendencies in comparison to three other conflict behavior instruments, although all four instruments may still be susceptible to some individual tendencies in this response bias. This study also investigated other aspects of substantive validity and structural validity. Lastly, this paper presented emerging evidence on external validity, which, while encouraging, suggests the need for continuing research efforts to investigate this aspect of validity for the new MODE instrument.Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Support for a two-dimensional model of conflict behaviorOrganizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1976
- Power and Conflict in the Student-Teacher RelationshipThe Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 1974
- Relation of Collaborative Interpersonal Relationships to Individual Satisfaction and Organizational PerformanceAdministrative Science Quarterly, 1971
- Methods of resolving superior-subordinate conflict: The constructive use of subordinate differences and disagreementsOrganizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1970
- Social desirability and the forced choice method.Journal of Consulting Psychology, 1960
- Social desirability and the description of others.The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1959
- Social desirability as a variable in the Edwards Personal Preference Schedule.Journal of Consulting Psychology, 1958
- The relationship between the judged desirability of a trait and the probability that the trait will be endorsed.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1953
- Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of testsPsychometrika, 1951
- A constant error in psychological ratings.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1920