On the preferred rotameric conformation for dopamine agonist action: an illusory quest?
- 1 April 1982
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology
- Vol. 34 (4) , 246-254
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2042-7158.1982.tb04236.x
Abstract
Putative dopamine agonists from the 2-aminotetrahydronaphthalene and trans-octahydrobenzo (f) and (g) quinoline series were shown to inhibit the spontaneous locomotor activity of mice. Marked potency differences were observed between the α- and β-rotameric conformations, compounds having the α-rotameric conformation having the greater potency. Thus, 2-di-n-propylmino-5,6-dihydroxytetrahydronaphthalene was 339 times more potent than the 6,7-dihydroxy isomer, and 2-n-propylamino-5,6-dihydroxy-compound was respectively 79 times and 179 times more potent than 6,7-hydroxy- and 7,8-dihydroxycompounds. trans-7,8-Dihydroxy-1-n-propyl-1,2,3,4,4a,9,10,10b-octahydrobenzo(f)quinoline was 11 times more potent than the β-rotamer, the 6,7-dihydroxy compound, and within the trans-octahydrobenzo(g)quinoline series the α-rotameric N-propyl derivative was 467 times more potent than the β-rotamer, and the α-rotameric >N–H analogue was 46 fold more potent than the β-rotamer. Thus, the α-rotamer appears the more potent in causing the present functional dopaminergic change. The dopaminergic nature of the response was indicated by its sensitivity to spiroperidol but not to yohimbine or prazosin. The possibility that a difference in behavioural potency between the α- and β-rotamers may reflect a differential metabolism by catechol-O-methyl transferase was assessed by administration of different agonists after pyrogallol pre treatment. This potentiated the activity of 2-di-n-propylamino-6,7-dihydroxytetrahydro-naphthalene but not that of the 5,6-dihydroxy analogue. However, changes in the effects of N-propyl derivatives of trans-octahydrobenzo(f) and (g)quinoline were not marked and, in all experiments, pyrogallol treatment failed by orders of magnitude to shift the dose-response curves of the β-rotamers to indicate a comparable potency to the α-rotameric forms.This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Characterisation of the mechanisms by which purported dopamine agonists reduce spontaneous locomotor activity of miceEuropean Journal of Pharmacology, 1981
- The hypotheses of different dopamine receptor mechanismsLife Sciences, 1981
- 2-Amino-6,7-dihydroxytetrahydronaphthalene and the receptor-site preferred conformation of dopamine—a commentaryJournal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, 1980
- Congeners of the .beta. conformer of dopamine derived from cis- and trans-octahydrobenzo[f]quinoline and trans-octahydrobenzo[g]quinolineJournal of Medicinal Chemistry, 1980
- Rigid congeners of dopamine based on octahydrobenzo[f]quinoline: peripheral and central effectsJournal of Medicinal Chemistry, 1979
- Facile syntheses of potent dopaminergic agonists and their effects on neurotransmitter releaseJournal of Medicinal Chemistry, 1978
- Effects of some derivatives of 2-aminotetralin on dopamine-sensitive adenylate cyclase and on the binding of [3H]haloperidol to neuro-leptic receptors in the rat striatumBiochemical Pharmacology, 1978
- Cerebral dopamine agonist properties of some 2-aminotetralin derivatives after peripheral and intracerebral administrationJournal of Medicinal Chemistry, 1977
- Differential activation by some 2-aminotetralin derivatives of the receptor mechanisms in the nucleus accumbens of rat which mediate hyperactivity and stereotyped bitingEuropean Journal of Pharmacology, 1977
- The structure of the catecholamines. II. The crystal structure of dopamine hydrochlorideActa Crystallographica Section B: Structural Science, Crystal Engineering and Materials, 1968