Comparison of trial-and-error and graduated stimulus change procedures across tasks
- 31 December 1985
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in Analysis and Intervention in Developmental Disabilities
- Vol. 6 (1-2) , 127-136
- https://doi.org/10.1016/0270-4684(86)90010-8
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- The effects of fading procedures on discrimination shifts.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 1981
- Enhanced learning of new discriminations after stimulus fadingBulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 1980
- The simplest treatment alternative: The law of parsimony applied to choosing appropriate instructional control and errorless-learning procedures for the difficult-to-teach childJournal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 1979
- CONTROL BY STIMULUS FEATURES DURING FADING1Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1979
- EFFECTS OF ERROR AND ERRORLESS DISCRIMINATION ACQUISITION ON REVERSAL LEARNNGJournal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1978
- Fading procedures and oddity learning in kindergarten childrenJournal of Experimental Child Psychology, 1974
- FADING PROCEDURES AND CONDITIONAL DISCRIMINATION IN CHILDREN1Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1968
- Discrimination reversal following learning without “errors”Psychonomic Science, 1968
- ERRORLESS ESTABLISHMENT OF VISUAL DISCRIMINATION USING FADING PROCEDURES1Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1964
- PROGRAMMING STIMULI IN MATCHING TO SAMPLE1Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1962