The simplest treatment alternative: The law of parsimony applied to choosing appropriate instructional control and errorless-learning procedures for the difficult-to-teach child
- 1 December 1979
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
- Vol. 9 (4) , 361-382
- https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01531445
Abstract
A method for choosing effective teaching procedures for difficult-to-teach children is proposed. Assessment of child responses duringteaching that involves gradually increasing environmental support in the learning setting is the basis for choice. The levels of environmental support in which child responses are assessed are (1) trial-and-error procedures; (2) increased environmental support involving analyses of reinforcement systems, incompatible responses, and prerequisite skills, as well as the most effective use of instructional control; and (3) errorless-learning procedures. Effects of instructions upon learning are discussed in terms of instructional detail and pacing, as well as with respect to the role of instructions in feedback and progressively delayed cue procedures. Stimulus shaping and stimulus fading are discussed in terms of the effectiveness of each for teaching children who have difficulty learning with more traditional procedures. The importance of the incorporation of criterion-related cues when utilizing stimulus shaping or fading is emphasized. It is proposed that an assessment of child responses should be made with respect to the three general levels of environmental support, as well as from sublevels within these, in order to choose the simplest but still effective alternative procedure for teaching difficult-to-teach children.Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Variables affecting stimulus fading and discriminative responding in psychotic children.Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 1978
- Some detrimental effects of using extra stimuli to guide learning in normal and autistic childrenJournal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 1976
- Fading procedures and oddity learning in kindergarten childrenJournal of Experimental Child Psychology, 1974
- THE EFFICACY OF STIMULUS FADING AND CONTINGENCY MANAGEMENT IN THE TREATMENT OF ELECTIVE MUTISM: A CASE STUDY1Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1973
- TRANSFER OF STIMULUS CONTROL: MEASURING THE MOMENT OF TRANSFER1Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1971
- FADING PROCEDURES AND CONDITIONAL DISCRIMINATION IN CHILDREN1Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1968
- THE EFFECTS OF GRADUATED STIMULUS CHANGE ON THE ACQUISITION OF A SIMPLE DISCRIMINATION IN SEVERELY RETARDED BOYS1Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1968
- Studies in the Experimental Development of Left—Right Concepts in Retarded Children Using Fading TechniquesInternational Review of Research in Mental Retardation, 1968
- The transfer of a discrimination along a continuum.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1952
- Latency of response in a choice discrimination.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1943