PROGNOSTIC VALUE OF ESTROGEN AND PROGESTERONE RECEPTORS MEASURED BY ENZYME IMMUNOASSAYS IN HUMAN-BREAST TUMOR CYTOSOLS
- 1 November 1989
- journal article
- research article
- Vol. 49 (21) , 5823-5828
Abstract
Clinically significant cut-off values of discriminate between receptor-positive and -negative, and the prognostic value of estrogen receptors (ER) and progesterone receptors (PgR) measured by enzyme immunoassay (EIA) have not yet been established. We have therefore measured ER and PgR by EIA in cytosols from 205 primary breast cancer biopsies. Clinically significant cut-off values (30 fmol/mg protein for ER; 27 fmol/ mg protein for PgR), as related to tumor recurrence (median follow-up, 47 months), have been established by isotonic regression analysis. These data were compared to those obtained by simultaneously performed dextran-coated charcoal (DCC) assays (cut-off values: 18 fmol/mg protein for ER, and 26 fmol/mg protein for PgR) on the same cytosols, and to DCC assays performed previously (up to 10 years ago) on cytosols prepared from other parts of the tissue biopsies (cut-off values: 18 fmol/mg protein for ER, and 23 fmol/mg protein for PgR). Using the cut-off values for the EIA and the DCC assays performed on the same cytosols, the discrepancies between receptor status appeared less than 10% both for ER and for PgR. Furthermore, the concentrations of ER or PgR detected with the EIA or DCC assay were highly and significantly correlated (Spearman rank correlations: for ER, Rs = 0.94; for PgR Rs = 0.88; P < 0.0001). After classification in different phenotypes with respect to ER/PgR status (+/+, +/-, -/+, and -/-), analysis for relapse-free survival and overall survival showed equal prognostic power in the comparable groups in the order, from favorable to unfavorable, of +/+ > +/-, (-/+) > -/- (.chi.2: P < 0.0001), irrespective of the assay which has been used for quantification of the receptor. It is concluded that both the conventionally used DCC and the newly available EIA methods are equally useful for assessing ER and PgR status.This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comparison of enzyme immunoassay with dextran-coated charcoal method in the determination of progesterone receptor in breast cancer cytosolsEuropean Journal of Cancer and Clinical Oncology, 1988
- Comparison of enzyme immunoassay and dextran-coated charcoal techniques for progesterone receptor determination in human breast cancer cytosolsThe Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, 1988
- An enzyme immunoassay compared with a ligand-binding assay for measuring progesterone receptors in cytosols from breast cancers.Clinical Chemistry, 1988
- The prognostic value and relationships of patient characteristics, estrogen and progestin receptors, and site of relapse in primary breast cancerCancer, 1988
- MONOCLONAL-ANTIBODY TECHNIQUE FOR DETECTION OF ESTROGEN-RECEPTORS IN HUMAN-BREAST CANCER - GREATER SENSITIVITY AND MORE ACCURATE CLASSIFICATION OF RECEPTOR STATUS THAN THE DEXTRAN-COATED CHARCOAL METHOD1987
- IMMUNOLOGICAL QUANTITATION OF NUCLEAR RECEPTORS IN HUMAN-BREAST CANCER - RELATION TO CYTOSOLIC ESTROGEN AND PROGESTERONE RECEPTORS1987