Prognosis of angina with and without a diagnosis: 11 year follow up in the Whitehall II prospective cohort study
- 16 October 2003
- Vol. 327 (7420) , 895
- https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.327.7420.895
Abstract
Objective To investigate the prognosis of angina among people with and without diagnosis by a doctor and an abnormal cardiovascular test result. Design Prospective cohort study with a median follow up of 11 years. Setting 20 civil service departments originally located in London. Participants 10 308 civil servants aged 35-55 years at baseline. Main outcome measures Recurrent reports of angina; quality of life (SF-36 physical functioning); non-fatal myocardial infarction; death from any cause (n = 344). Results 1158 (11.4%) participants developed angina, and 813 (70%) had no evidence of diagnosis by a doctor at the time of the initial report. Participants without a diagnosis had an increased risk of impaired physical functioning (age and sex adjusted odds ratio of 2.36 (95% confidence interval 1.91 to 2.90)) compared with those who had neither angina nor myocardial infarction throughout follow up. Among reported cases of angina without a diagnosis, the 15.5% with an abnormality on a study electrocardiogram had an increased risk of death (hazard ratio 2.37 (1.16 to 4.87)). These effects were similar in magnitude to those in participants with a diagnosis of angina. Conclusion Undiagnosed angina was common and had an adverse impact on prognosis comparable to that of diagnosed angina, particularly among people with electrocardiographic abnormalities. Efforts to improve prognosis among people with angina should take account of this submerged clinical iceberg.Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Iceberg: 'Completing the clinical picture' in general practiceInternational Journal of Epidemiology, 2013
- Population need for coronary revascularisation: are national targets for England credible?Heart, 2002
- Variability of Angina Symptoms and the Risk of Major Ischemic Heart Disease EventsAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 2001
- Evidence-based guideline for the primary care management of stable angina.Family Practice, 2001
- Underuse of Coronary Revascularization Procedures in Patients Considered Appropriate Candidates for RevascularizationNew England Journal of Medicine, 2001
- Social and gender variation in the prevalence, presentation and general practitioner provisional diagnosis of chest painJournal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 2000
- Impact of socioeconomic status on coronary mortality in people with symptoms, electrocardiographic abnormalities, both or neither: the original Whitehall study 25 year follow upJournal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 2000
- Quality of life after coronary angioplasty or continued medical treatment for angina: three-year follow-up in the RITA-2 trialJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 2000
- Association of Nonspecific Minor ST-T Abnormalities With Cardiovascular MortalityJAMA, 1999
- Validity of a Self-reported History of Doctor-diagnosed AnginaJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1999