What `Rules' in Sentencing? Consistency and Disparity in the Absence of `Rules'
- 30 September 1998
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in International Journal of the Sociology of Law
- Vol. 26 (3) , 339-364
- https://doi.org/10.1006/ijsl.1998.0070
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Sentencing the Multiple Offender: Towards Detailed Sentencing Statistics for Armed RobbersAustralian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 1998
- Informing the discretion: the sentencing information system of the judicial commission of New South WalesInternational Journal of Law and Information Technology, 1998
- Conceptions and Representations of the Sentencing Decision ProcessJournal of Law and Society, 1997
- DIVERSION FROM PROSECUTION INTO PSYCHIATRIC CAR: Who Controls the Gates?The British Journal of Criminology, 1997
- Sentencing, Rationality, and Computer TechnologyJournal of Law and Society, 1995
- CUSTODIAL DECISION MAKING IN A MAGISTRATES' COURTThe British Journal of Criminology, 1995
- Language, Law, and Society: Policy Implications of the Kennedy Smith Rape TrialLaw & Society Review, 1995
- Sentencing and Information Technology: Incidental Reform?International Journal of Law and Information Technology, 1994
- Truth in sentencingBehavioral Sciences & the Law, 1989
- Guidelines are not enough: The need for written sentencing opinionsBehavioral Sciences & the Law, 1989