Effects of Monotherapy and Polytherapy on the Blink Reflex in Epileptic Patients
- 1 November 1993
- Vol. 34 (6) , 1085-1088
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1528-1157.1993.tb02137.x
Abstract
Summary: We performed the blink reflex (BR) in 20 normal volunteers, 13 epileptic patients receiving antiepileptic drug (AED) monotherapy, and 13 epileptic patients receiving AED polytherapy. Comparison of R1, ipsilateral and contralateral R2 and VIIth nerve latencies in the three groups showed no statistically significant differences in R1 and VIIth nerve latencies among the three groups. There were statistically significant differences between the polytherapy group and the monotherapy and control groups in comparisons of ipsilateral and contralateral R2. There were no significant differences between the monotherapy group and the control group for ipsilateral and contralateral R2. We hypothesized that AED polytherapy might interfere with synaptic transmission in the polysynaptic pathway of the blink reflex, prolonging the latency of R2. These results provide further evidence of the pathophysiologic effects associated with polytherapy in epileptic patients.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Pattern-Reversal Visual Evoked Potentials Recorded in Children with Generalized EpilepsyClinical Electroencephalography, 1990
- Electrophysiologic Effects of γ‐Vinyl GABA and CarbamazepineEpilepsia, 1989
- Carbamazepine Does Not Affect Short‐Latency Somatosensory Evoked Potentials: A Longitudinal Study in Newly Diagnosed EpilepsyEpilepsia, 1988
- Effects of Long-Lasting Antiepileptic Therapy on Brainstem Auditory Evoked PotentialsNeuropsychobiology, 1988
- Clinical Uses of Recorded Jaw and Blink ReflexesPublished by Springer Nature ,1985
- Phenytoin prolongs far‐field somatosensory and auditory evoked potential interpeak latenciesNeurology, 1982
- Depression of synaptic transmission by diphenylhydantoinAnnals of Neurology, 1977
- Effect of some anticonvulsant drugs on the spinal trigeminal nucleusNeurology, 1967
- PRELIMINARY NOTE ON A NEW CRANIAL REFLEX.The Lancet, 1896