Long-term outcome after biologic versus mechanical aortic valve replacement in 841 patients
- 1 May 1999
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
- Vol. 117 (5) , 890-897
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5223(99)70368-5
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients 80 Years of Age and OlderCirculation, 1997
- Porcine bioprostheses in the elderly: Clinical performance by age groups and valve positionsThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 1995
- Clinical performance of biological and mechanical prosthesesThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 1995
- Mechanical versus biological valve prosthesis: A ten-year comparison regarding function and quality of lifeThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 1995
- Bioprosthetic and mechanical valves in the elderly: Benefits and risksThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 1995
- Comparison of porcine bioprostheses and mechanical prostheses in multiple valve replacement operationsThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 1995
- Which prosthetic valve should we choose?Current Opinion in Cardiology, 1995
- A Comparison of Outcomes in Men 11 Years after Heart-Valve Replacement with a Mechanical Valve or BioprosthesisNew England Journal of Medicine, 1993
- Modern Cardiac Valve Devices? Bioprostheses and Mechanical Prostheses: State of the ArtJournal of Cardiac Surgery, 1993
- Aortic valve replacement with the Hancock standard, Björk-Shiley, and Lillehei-Kaster prosthesesThe Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 1989