Inefficient Foreign Borrowing: A Dual- and Common-Agency Perspective
- 1 November 2003
- journal article
- Published by American Economic Association in American Economic Review
- Vol. 93 (5) , 1678-1702
- https://doi.org/10.1257/000282803322655491
Abstract
Studying the implications of uncoordinated borrowing, the paper first looks at whether and when countries borrow too much in the aggregate. It then revisits the “original sin” debate, analyzing whether and when equity portfolio investment, international portfolio diversification, domestic currency denomination and longer maturities enhance borrowing countries’ access to international lending. The paper thereby relates a country’s level and quality of access to international capital markets to a variety of institutional features such as the level of domestic savings, their location, the extent of control rights held by political authorities, and the interests of dominant domestic political forces.Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Machiavellian PrivatizationAmerican Economic Review, 2002
- Trying to Explain Home Bias in Equities and ConsumptionJournal of Economic Literature, 1999
- The Value of Trade Agreements in the presence of Political pressuresJournal of Political Economy, 1998
- North-South lending and endogenous domestic capital market inefficienciesJournal of Monetary Economics, 1990
- A Constant Recontracting Model of Sovereign DebtJournal of Political Economy, 1989
- Public Debt Guarantees and Private Capital FlightThe World Bank Economic Review, 1987
- Fiscal increasing returns, hysteresis, real wages and unemploymentEuropean Economic Review, 1987
- Common AgencyEconometrica, 1986
- Overinsurance and Public Provision of Insurance: The Roles of Moral Hazard and Adverse SelectionThe Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1974
- Optimum Tariffs and RetaliationThe Review of Economic Studies, 1953