Effect of azelastine on bronchoconstriction induced by histamine and leukotriene C4 in patients with extrinsic asthma.
- 1 April 1988
- Vol. 43 (4) , 306-311
- https://doi.org/10.1136/thx.43.4.306
Abstract
Azelastine, a new oral agent with antiallergic and antihistamine properties, has been shown to inhibit the effect of histamine and leukotriene (LT) in vitro, though not a specific leukotriene receptor antagonist. The effect of both a single dose (8.8 mg) and 14 days' treatment (8.8 mg twice daily) with azelastine on bronchoconstriction induced by LTC4 and histamine has been examined in 10 patients with mild asthma in a placebo controlled, double blind, crossover study. LTC4 and histamine were inhaled in doubling concentrations from a dosimeter and the results expressed as the cumulative dose (PD) producing a 20% fall in FEV1 (PD20FEV1) and 35% fall in specific airways conductance (PD35sGaw). The single dose of azelastine produced a significantly greater FEV1 and sGaw values than placebo at 3 hours, but this bronchodilator effect was not present after 14 days of treatment. Azelastine was an effective H1 antagonist; after a single dose and 14 days' treatment with placebo the geometric mean PD20FEV1 histamine values (mumol) were 0.52 (95% confidence interval 0.14-1.83) and 0.54 (0.12-2.38), compared with 22.9 (11.5-38.3) and 15.2 (6.47-35.6) after azelastine (p less than 0.01 for both). LTC4 was on average 1000 times more potent than histamine in inducing bronchoconstriction. Azelastine did not inhibit the effect of inhaled LTC4; the geometric mean PD20FEV1 LTC4 (nmol) after a single dose and 14 days' treatment was 0.60 and 0.59 with placebo compared with 0.65 and 0.75 with azelastine. The PD35sGaw LTC4 was also unchanged at 0.66 and 0.73 for placebo compared with 0.83 and 0.74 for azelastine. Thus prolonged blockade of H1 receptors did not attenuate the response to LTC4, suggesting that histamine and LTC4 act on bronchial smooth muscle through different receptors. Four patients complained of drowsiness while taking azelastine but only one who was taking placebo and three patients complained of a bitter, metallic taste while taking azelastine.This publication has 32 references indexed in Scilit:
- A new adaptable computerized system for the measurement of specific airways conductanceRespiratory Medicine, 1986
- Astemizole and other H1-antihistaminic drug treatment of asthmaJournal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 1985
- The effect of astemizole on exercise-induced asthmaRespiratory Medicine, 1984
- Comparative effects of inhaled leukotriene C4, leukotriene D4, and histamine in normal human subjects.Thorax, 1984
- Peptide Leukotriene Release after Antigen Challenge in Patients Sensitive to RagweedNew England Journal of Medicine, 1984
- Terfenadine in exercise induced asthma.BMJ, 1984
- Effects of Leukotriene D on the Airways in AsthmaNew England Journal of Medicine, 1983
- Identification of the C(6)-S-conjugate of leukotriene a with cysteine as a naturally occurring slow reacting substance of anaphylaxis (SRS-A). Importance of the 11-cis-geometry for biological activityBiochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, 1980
- Inhaled antihistamines--bronchodilatation and effects on histamine- and methacholine-induced bronchoconstriction.Thorax, 1978
- Bronchodilating activity of an H blocker, chlorpheniramineJournal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 1977