Comparison of Solid Phase Extraction Techniques for Herbicides
- 1 September 1996
- journal article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Weed Science
- Vol. 44 (3) , 689-693
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0043174500094546
Abstract
Solid phase extraction (SPE) procedures were used to determine the recoveries of herbicides typically used in containerized ornamental plant production from water samples. Recoveries from C18cartridges and disks were compared for each of 12 herbicides with variations in elution solvent and volume of elution solvent tested. Recoveries for nine of the herbicides from the cartridges and disks using acetone as an elution solvent were not affected by SPE matrix. Fluazifop recovery was greater with the disks, while napropamide and oxadiazon recoveries were greater with cartridges. Both cartridges and disks yielded low recoveries (23 to 47%) of benefin and prodiamine. Changing the elution solvent from acetone to acetonitrile resulted in 10% improvement for the recovery of benefin and a three- to four-fold increase in recovery of prodiamine. Acetonitrile decreased recoveries of napropamide, oryzalin, oxadiazon, oxyfluorfen, and pendimethalin from cartridges. For the disks, oxyfluorfen, prodiamine, and trifluralin had increased recovery, while fluazifop, oxadiazon, and simazine had decreased recovery with acetonitrile as the elution solvent. Increasing the amount of acetone eluting solvent increased the recovery of prodiamine and oxyfluorfen while decreasing the recovery of fluazifop, pendimethalin, simazine, and trifluralin. Binding capacities of oryzalin on cartridges and disks averaged 13.2 and 7.8 mg, respectively. The advantage of the disk lies in the greater volume of water that can be processed, while the higher cost and greater variability are disadvantages. Cartridge extraction yielded good recoveries with lower standard deviations, and used less organic solvent. Selection of an SPE extraction method depends upon the herbicides under evaluation, expected levels, and the water volume being processed. Both SPE techniques offer advantages over traditional liquid-liquid extraction methods such as reduced requirements for organic solvent and sample preparation.Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Herbicide Runoff from Ornamental Container NurseriesJournal of Environmental Quality, 1994
- Pendimethalin and Oxyfluorfen Residues in Pond Water and Sediment from Container Plant NurseriesWeed Technology, 1994
- Development and optimization of a solid-phase extraction scheme for determination of the pesticides metribuzin, atrazine, metolachlor and esfenvalerate in agricultural runoff waterJournal of Chromatography A, 1994
- Solid-phase extraction in multi-residue pesticide analysis of waterJournal of Chromatography A, 1993
- Solid-phase extraction followed by high-performance liquid chromatographic analysis for monitoring herbicides in drinking waterJournal of Chromatography A, 1993
- Use of extraction disks for trace enrichment of various pesticides from river water and simulated seawater samples followed by liquid chromatography-rapid-scanning UV-visible and thermospray-mass spectrometry detectionEnvironmental Science & Technology, 1993
- Evaluation of the membrane approach to solid‐phase extractions of pesticide residues in drinking waterPesticide Science, 1992
- Membrane approach to solid-phase extractionsAnalytica Chimica Acta, 1990
- Competitive Effects of Weeds on the Growth of Container-grown PlantsHortScience, 1990
- Reversed-Phase Solid-Phase Extraction for Aqueous Environmental Sample Preparation in Herbicide Residue AnalysisJournal of Chromatographic Science, 1987