Accepting the null hypothesis
- 1 January 1995
- journal article
- Published by Springer Nature in Memory & Cognition
- Vol. 23 (1) , 132-138
- https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03210562
Abstract
This article concerns acceptance of the null hypothesis that one variable has no effect on another. Despite frequent opinions to the contrary, this null hypothesis can be correct in some situations. Appropriate criteria for accepting the null hypothesis are (1) that the null hypothesis is possible; (2) that the results are consistent with the null hypothesis; and (3) that the experiment was a good effort to find an effect. These criteria are consistent with the meta-rules for psychology. The good-effort criterion is subjective, which is somewhat undesirable, but the alternative—never accepting the null hypothesis—is neither desirable nor practical.Keywords
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- Implicit and Explicit Memory for Verbal Information Presented during SleepPsychological Science, 1992
- A power primer.Psychological Bulletin, 1992
- Implicit and Explicit Memory following Surgical AnesthesiaPsychological Science, 1990
- Methodological versus empirical literature: Two views on casual acceptance of the null hypothesis.American Psychologist, 1990
- Significance test or effect size?Psychological Bulletin, 1988
- Use and Misuse of No-Difference Findings in Eliminating Threats To ValidityEvaluation Review, 1986
- Testing for substantive significance in applied research by specifying nonzero effect null hypotheses.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1985
- The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results.Psychological Bulletin, 1979
- Consequences of prejudice against the null hypothesis.Psychological Bulletin, 1975
- The test of significance in psychological research.Psychological Bulletin, 1966