Use and Misuse of No-Difference Findings in Eliminating Threats To Validity
- 1 December 1986
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Evaluation Review
- Vol. 10 (6) , 836-852
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0193841x8601000608
Abstract
Donald Campbell and his colleagues have elaborated an approach to research based on the elimination of threats to four validity types: internal, external, construct, and statistical conclusion. The central thesis of this article is that the process of eliminating validity threats depends fundamentally on no-difference findings, a fact that, unfor tunately, has not been made explicit by researchers. The implications of this neglect are explored using examples from a number of different substantive areas such as psychology, health, and medicine. Finally, the intrinsic role of no-difference findings is described in the context of all four validity types, and suggestions for improving the process are offered.Keywords
This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- Assessment of Double-blindness at the Conclusion of the β-Blocker Heart Attack TrialPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1985
- Applying results of randomised trials to clinical practice: impact of losses before randomisation.BMJ, 1984
- Bias in Treatment Assignment in Controlled Clinical TrialsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1983
- A Note on Pooling VariancesJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1983
- Coronary artery surgery study (CASS): a randomized trial of coronary artery bypass surgery. Quality of life in patients randomly assigned to treatment groups.Circulation, 1983
- Neuropsychological Recovery in Head InjuryArchives of Neurology, 1983
- The Therapeutic Efficacy of Hemodialysis in SchizophreniaNew England Journal of Medicine, 1983
- “Proving the null hypothesis” in clinical trialsControlled Clinical Trials, 1982
- RANDOMISED CONTROLLED TRIAL OF A NO-ADDED-SODIUM DIET FOR MILD HYPERTENSIONThe Lancet, 1982
- Assessing similarity between profiles.Psychological Bulletin, 1953