Intensity‐modulated or conformal radiotherapy improves the quality of life of patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma
- 8 January 2007
- Vol. 109 (2) , 313-321
- https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.22396
Abstract
BACKGROUND. It was reported previously that the dosimetric superiority of conformal radiotherapy (RT), either 3‐dimensional conformal RT (3D‐CRT) or intensity‐modulated RT (IMRT), over conventional 2D‐RT translated into clinical benefits for patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). In this study, the authors compared quality‐of‐life (QOL) outcomes of NPC survivors who received treatment with 1 of 4 different RT techniques at a single institute during different periods. METHODS. The authors analyzed QOL data of from 237 patients with NPC who were cancer free for 2 or 3 years when their QOL was assessed. The study population included 152 patients who received conventional RT (2D‐RT, 61 patients; 2D‐RT plus 3D‐CRT boost, 91 patients) and 85 patients who received conformal RT (3D‐CRT, 33 patients; IMRT, 52 patients). The European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Core QOL questionnaire and the EORTC Head and Neck QOL questionnaire were completed. RESULTS. Compared with patients who received with conventional RT, patients who received conformal RT had both statistically (P < .05) and clinically (a difference in mean scores ≥10 points) significant improvements in the scales of global QOL, pain, appetite loss, senses, speech, social eating, teeth, opening mouth, xerostomia, sticky saliva, and feeling ill. No significant difference was observed in any of the scales that compared 2D‐RT with 2D‐RT plus 3D‐CRT boost or that compared 3D‐CRT with IMRT. Survivors who received conformal RT had a 2.01‐fold higher probability (odds ratio [OR], 2.01; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.19–3.68) of reporting good global QOL and a 2.70‐fold lower probability (OR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.20–0.66) of reporting a high level of xerostomia than survivors who received conventional RT. CONCLUSIONS. Conformal RT substantially improved head and neck‐related symptoms and broad aspects of QOL for survivors of NPC. Cancer 2007. © 2006 American Cancer Society.Keywords
This publication has 35 references indexed in Scilit:
- Preservation of quality of life after intensity‐modulated radiotherapy for early‐stage nasopharyngeal carcinoma: Results of a prospective longitudinal studyHead & Neck, 2006
- Assessment of quality of life of nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients with EORTC QLQ-C30 and H&N-35 modulesInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, 2005
- Matched case–control study of quality of life and xerostomia after intensity-modulated radiotherapy or standard radiotherapy for head-and-neck cancer: Initial reportInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, 2005
- Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for nasopharynx cancer: Update of the Memorial Sloan-Kettering experiencePublished by Elsevier ,2005
- Treatment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma with intensity-modulated radiotherapy: The Hong Kong experienceInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, 2004
- Radiotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma—transition from two-dimensional to three-dimensional methodsRadiotherapy and Oncology, 2004
- Intensity‐modulated radiotherapy for early‐stage nasopharyngeal carcinomaCancer, 2004
- Preservation of oral health–related quality of life and salivary flow rates after inverse-planned intensity- modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for head-and-neck cancerInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, 2004
- The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: A Quality-of-Life Instrument for Use in International Clinical Trials in OncologyJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 1993
- Quality of life and patients with cancer: A comparative study of patient versus physician perceptions and its implications for cancer educationJournal of Cancer Education, 1992